Eliminate Risk of Failure with Saviynt SAVIGA-C01 Exam Dumps

To reduce certification fatigue for Anitha, a manager with a large number of remote users, the recommended approach is C. Launch a Self Certification Campaign and then User Manager Campaign on certified items. Here's the rationale:

Self Certification Campaign:

Purpose: Allows users to review and certify their own access.

Benefits for this scenario:

Reduces Manager Burden: Shifts the initial review responsibility from Anitha to the individual users, who are most familiar with their own access needs.

Scalability: Well-suited for large, distributed teams, as it doesn't rely solely on the manager's capacity.

Empowerment: Gives users more control over their access and promotes a culture of accountability.

User Manager Campaign on Certified Items:

Purpose: Allows managers to review and certify their subordinates' access.

Benefits when combined with Self Certification:

Focus on Exceptions: Anitha can focus her review on items that were not self-certified or that require further scrutiny after the initial self-certification.

Reduced Volume: The volume of items Anitha needs to review is significantly reduced, as users have already certified their own access.

Increased Efficiency: Streamlines the manager's review process, making it more manageable and less time-consuming.

Why Other Options Are Less Suitable:

A . Launch User Manager Campaign and then Self Certification Campaign on certified items: This sequence is less effective because it puts the burden on the manager first, potentially leading to fatigue.

B . Launch Application Owner Campaign and then Self Certification Campaign on certified items: Application Owner campaigns are not relevant to a manager's review of their subordinates' access.

D . Launch Service Account Campaign and then User Manager Campaign on certified items: Service Account campaigns are for reviewing service accounts, not user access.

To decommission an AD Group and revoke access for all users, Jane should use D. Entitlement Owner Certification. Here is why:

AD Group as an Entitlement: In Saviynt, an AD Group is typically represented as an Entitlement.

Entitlement Owner Certification: This type of campaign allows the designated owner of an entitlement (in this case, Jane, as the manager of the AD Group) to review and certify who should have access to that entitlement.

Revoking Access: As the Entitlement Owner, Jane can use the certification campaign to:

Review the list of users: See all users who are currently members of the AD Group.

Revoke access for all users: Mark all users for removal from the group.

Decommissioning the Group: After revoking access for all users through the certification, Jane can then proceed with decommissioning the AD Group itself (either through Saviynt if it manages AD group lifecycle or directly in Active Directory).

Why Other Options Are Less Suitable:

A . Segregation of Duties: SoD is a principle, not a specific action for revoking access.

B . Entitlement Update Rule: While rules can automate some actions, a certification campaign provides a more controlled and auditable way to review and revoke access, especially for a sensitive action like decommissioning a group.

C . Mitigation Control: Mitigation controls are used to manage SoD conflicts, not for revoking access to entitlements.

In conclusion: An Entitlement Owner Certification campaign provides a structured and auditable way for Jane to review the membership of the AD Group, revoke access for all users, and prepare for the group's decommissioning, aligning with best practices for access management.

To view the Entitlements Query used in a previously launched Campaign in Saviynt, a Campaign Owner can use the C. Campaign Summary. Here's why:

Saviynt's Campaign Summary: The Campaign Summary provides a detailed overview of a campaign's configuration, including:

Campaign Scope: The users, applications, or entitlements included in the campaign.

Filters and Queries: Any filters or queries used to define the campaign scope, including the Entitlements Query.

Certifier Information: Details about the assigned certifiers.

Schedule: The campaign's start and end dates.

Status: The current status of the campaign (e.g., Active, Completed, Expired).

Accessing the Entitlements Query: The Campaign Summary typically includes a section that displays the exact query used to select the entitlements included in the campaign.

Why Other Options Are Less Suitable:

A . Reconfigure option: While you might be able to see the query by going into the reconfiguration, it's not the most direct way. The Campaign Summary is designed to provide this information readily.

B . Campaign Export: Exporting the campaign data might include the list of entitlements but not necessarily the original query used to select them.

D . Export option at the top right corner of the page, next to the Refresh Progress option: This option typically exports the current view of the campaign data, not the underlying configuration details like the Entitlements Query.

In conclusion: The Campaign Summary in Saviynt is the most direct and convenient place for a Campaign Owner to review the detailed configuration of a campaign, including the Entitlements Query used to define the campaign's scope.

The process of Attestation or Certification in the context of Saviynt can be best described as B . Access Reviews. Here's why:

Attestation/Certification: These terms are often used interchangeably in the context of identity governance. They refer to the process of formally reviewing and approving or revoking user access rights.

Access Reviews: This is the broader term that encompasses the entire process of periodically reviewing user access to ensure it is appropriate and aligned with business needs and security policies. Attestation and Certification are specific actions performed within an access review.

Saviynt's Campaigns: Saviynt's campaigns are designed to facilitate and manage access reviews.

Why Other Options Are Less Suitable:

A . Segregation of Duties: SoD is a principle that aims to prevent fraud and errors by dividing critical tasks among different individuals. While access reviews can help enforce SoD, they are not the same thing.

C . Access Request: This is the process of requesting access to resources, which is a separate process from reviewing existing access.

D . Application Onboarding: This is the process of integrating an application into Saviynt, which is a prerequisite for access reviews but not the review process itself.

In conclusion: Attestation or Certification, as performed within Saviynt campaigns, are integral parts of the broader process of Access Reviews, which aim to ensure that user access is appropriate, authorized, and aligned with security policies.

The statement 'An Application Owner Campaign can have multiple primary Certifiers and a single secondary Certifier' is generally False in Saviynt. Here's why:

Saviynt's Application Owner Campaign: This campaign type is designed for Application Owners to review and certify access to their applications.

Primary Certifier: There is usually a single designated Application Owner for each application. This is because application ownership is typically a single point of accountability. While it is technically possible to assign multiple owners, it is not considered a best practice.

Secondary Certifiers (Backup/Delegates): Application Owner Campaigns can have multiple secondary certifiers. These are often used as:

Backup: To ensure the campaign can proceed if the primary certifier is unavailable.

Delegates: To allow the primary certifier to delegate some of the certification tasks.

Consultants: Other stakeholders, such as security or compliance teams, who can be consulted during the decision-making process.

Why the Statement Is Generally False: The core principle of application ownership implies a single point of accountability. While multiple secondary certifiers can assist, having multiple primary certifiers can lead to confusion and conflicting decisions.

Possible Exceptions (Less Common):

Highly Customized Configurations: In some very specific scenarios, organizations might customize Saviynt to allow multiple primary certifiers for an application, but this is not a standard or recommended practice.