Eliminate Risk of Failure with Fortinet NSE7_ZTA-7.2 Exam Dumps

In the context of zero-trust telemetry compliance, the three true statements are:

A) FortiClient EMS creates dynamic policies using ZTNA tags: FortiClient EMS utilizes ZTNA (Zero Trust Network Access) tags to create dynamic policies based on the telemetry it receives from endpoints.

B) FortiClient checks the endpoint using the ZTNA tags provided by FortiClient EMS: FortiClient on the endpoint uses the ZTNA tags from FortiClient EMS to determine compliance with the specified security policies.

D) FortiOS provides network access to the endpoint based on the zero-trust tagging rules: FortiOS, the operating system running on FortiGate devices, uses the zero-trust tagging rules to make decisions on network access for endpoints.

The other options are not accurate in this context:

C) ZTNA tags are configured in FortiClient, based on criteria such as certificates and the logged-in domain: ZTNA tags are typically configured and managed in FortiClient EMS, not directly in FortiClient.

E) FortiClient EMS sends the endpoint information received through FortiClient Telemetry to FortiOS: While FortiClient EMS does process telemetry data, the direct sending of endpoint information to FortiOS is not typically described in this manner.

Zero Trust Telemetry in Fortinet Solutions.

FortiClient EMS and FortiOS Integration for ZTNA.

A persistent agent is an application that works on Windows, macOS, or Linux hosts to identify them to FortiNAC Manager and scan them for compliance with an endpoint compliance policy. A persistent agent can support advanced custom scans and software inventory, apply supplicant configuration to a host, and be used for automatic registration and authentication.Reference:=

Persistent Agent

Persistent Agent on Windows

Using the Persistent Agent

Endpoint compliance is defined in the policy configuration stage of FortiNAC. Endpoint compliance policies specify which endpoint compliance configuration and user/host profile are applied to a host based on its location, user, and device type. Endpoint compliance configurations define whether a host is required to download an agent and undergo a scan, permitted access with no scan, or denied access. The scan parameters and security actions are also configured in the endpoint compliance configurations.Therefore, to define endpoint compliance, you need to create and assign endpoint compliance policies and configurations in the policy configuration stage of FortiNAC.Reference:= https://docs.fortinet.com/document/fortinac/9.4.0/administration-guide/985922/endpoint-compliance-policies

https://docs.fortinet.com/document/fortinac/9.4.0/fortinac-manager/161887/endpoint-compliance-configurations

Given the output showing a real-time debug, the statement that describes the login failure is:

C) student is not part of the usergroup SSL_VPN_Users: The debug log contains a line that says 'fnbam_cert_check_group_list-checking group with name 'SSL_VPN_Users'' followed by 'peer_check_add_peer_check_student' and later 'RDN_match-Checking 'CN' val 'STUDENT' -- no match.' This suggests that the certificate presented has a common name (CN) of 'student', which does not match or is not authorized under the 'SSL_VPN_Users' group expected for successful authentication.

With the increase in IoT devices, enterprises face many challenges in securing and managing their network and data. Two of the most significant challenges are:

Unpatched vulnerabilities in IoT devices (Option C): IoT devices are often vulnerable to cyber attacks due to their increased exposure to the internet and their limited computing resources.Some of the security challenges in IoT include weak password protection, lack of regular patches and updates, insecure interfaces, insufficient data protection, and poor IoT device management12. Unpatched vulnerabilities in IoT devices can allow hackers to exploit them and compromise the network or data.For example, the Mirai malware infected IoT devices by using default credentials and created a massive botnet that launched DDoS attacks on internet services2.

Achieving full network visibility (Option D): IoT devices can generate a large amount of data that needs to be collected, processed, and analyzed. However, many enterprises lack the tools and capabilities to monitor and manage the IoT devices and data effectively. This can result in poor performance, inefficiency, and security risks. Achieving full network visibility means having a clear and comprehensive view of all the IoT devices, their status, their connectivity, their data flow, and their potential threats.This can help enterprises optimize their network performance, ensure data quality and integrity, and detect and prevent any anomalies or attacks3.